1. develop an acceptable document to all stakeholders
2. IS GMP-USA or its equivalent sufficiently forward looking based on PAPC Future scenarios?
3. need ambassadors/champions to “sell” the document. |
Use GMP-USA as framework (blueprint) for licensure & certification exams |
1. Licensure
2. Certification (continuance or maintenance)
3. Privileging for provision status |
1. Integrity of physician input, not someone else’s.
2. Trusted agent must be secure and shown to the user
3. Relevant to the work of the practicing MD.
4. Power of the community |
Broad endorsement by medical societies, academics and other physician organizations. |
Scare ‘em, pay ‘em.
1) Route will be imposed by reg. makes it possible to make it happen voluntarily.
2) ABMS certification
3) tie in to money in GP’s and hospitals.
New bible for the profession. 21st century testament |
- GMP-USA could provide guidance for admission communities and students about expectations.
- Cadre of current leaders in the regulatory systems that see the need and share common values.
- increasing interest inside and outside the profession to define standards of care. |
1) Tort reform
2) Acknowledgement of parallel obligations/responsibilities of other major participants (ie. patients, payers, government, etc.)
3) Simplification + Integration/Consolidation of physician assessment entities (ie.. medical boards, speciality boards, hospital, centralizing bodies, etc) |
1) Focus on younger generation for change
2) Create external pressure for adoption (laws, money)
3) Linking to a requirement to license or accreditation, certification |
Ameliorate doctors fears of litigation viz. the GMP ie. The GMP is formative rather than punitive. |
Use the GMP as a framework of evaluation at all points of evaluation of physicians. |
Identify the people & organization that doctors listen to & get them to support the GMP. Ie. consumers and medical organizations. |